Laws related to providing appropriate care for a child are complicated, and few people grasp the differences between the available options: guardianship and power of attorney. While both choices provide benefits, some issues complicate the arrangements.
While some jurisdictions use the terms interchangeably, they are not the same. A judge appoints a guardian, and the process required to be named a guardian is complicated. Due to those complexities, working with a family lawyer in Cullman is a must.
Guardianship removes the child’s right to make crucial decisions and turns those duties over to the guardian. In most instances, guardianship is the best way to provide the necessary care for a child who’s reached 18 years of age, but some issues may arise.
A power of attorney is substantially different. The child would voluntarily sign over their rights to what’s known as an agent or attorney-in-fact, who would typically be a parent. A power of attorney allows the agent to make decisions for the child, including those related to finances, resolving legal issues, or health care. This action is far simpler than going through the process of becoming a guardian but presents some potential problems. A power of attorney can be revoked at any time, which means the child can change their mind about delegating powers to a specific individual.
Anyone granting a power of attorney to another individual must be competent to do so. In other words, the very fact that a person has an intellectual disability may preclude their ability to grant those powers. That means a child with an intellectual disability that impacts their decision-making capacity would automatically be incapable of granting another person legal powers.
In many instances, that might not result in issues developing, but consider a child that requires significant medical care. Given the litigious nature of our society, doctors and medical care facilities may hesitate to provide treatment based on the use of a power of attorney if they feel the child didn’t have the mental capacity to understand what they were signing. That means needed treatments could be delayed or rejected while legal wrangling moves forward.
Additionally, the child could make unfortunate decisions related to their own care, as a power of attorney wouldn’t prevent that scenario from occurring. Or, the child could revoke the parent’s power of attorney and assign those powers to another individual who didn’t have the child’s best interests at heart.
Legal experts always recommend clients review the pros and cons of guardianship and power of attorney options before making any decisions. Here are a few of the elements anyone facing this decision should consider and discuss with their attorney.
Of course, every situation is somewhat different, which means family members need to consult a legal expert for advice when considering their options. The attorney will review the family’s needs and recommend a course of action that’s most likely to resolve any current or future issues.
In many instances, family members may feel a power of attorney provides the best solution, but that’s not always true. Remember that the child still has the power to make important decisions that could create significant problems. For example, they retain the right to sign documents or borrow money without your approval. While contracts can be contested in court under many circumstances, the process is costly and time-consuming.
On the other hand, guardianships pose their own hazards that go beyond the need for the courts to review the decisions made by the guardian. That’s why working closely with an attorney is stressed when entering that type of relationship. The interests of both the guardian and the child must both be met when selecting one or the other option.
The Kilgo Law Firm All Rights Reserved | The content on this website is owned by us and our licensors. Do not copy any content (including images) without our consent